<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A shocking example of Old Think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethomashowecompany.com/297/a-shocking-example-of-old-think-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/297/a-shocking-example-of-old-think-2</link>
	<description>Mashing Voice and Process without Mercy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:08:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Beckemeyer</title>
		<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/297/a-shocking-example-of-old-think-2/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>David Beckemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethomashowecompany.com/297/a-shocking-example-of-old-think-2#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas.  As usual, I probably didn&#039;t really get my full point across with my posts on this. A lot of people have taken my characterization of &quot;stagnant&quot; as &quot;dead&quot; and it&#039;s not the same at all.  In many ways, I was really hinting at exactly what you say, in terms of &quot;we are at the beginning&quot;, only you say it much better than I did.  This is exactly how I feel about it. The &quot;VoIP industry&quot; at large became boring and stagnant a while ago, as everybody simply copied Vonage or Skype or tried to come up with yet another way to shave a fraction of a penny off calls - and that&#039;s all the press saw and all they talked about.

What&#039;s far more exiting is the kinds of ways voice/voip can support other applications that Martin describes. We see this specifically in a sub-set of our PhoneGnome users. While the majority still see it as a way to make cheap calls (because that&#039;s what we all have told them VoIP is about), there is a sub-set that figured out other, far more powerful, benefits in the ways it lets them integrate their web, email, phone(s), voicemails, texts, desktop, laptop and such. That&#039;s when one gets really hooked and realizes the &quot;phone companies&quot; (you can include Vonage and Cable MSOs in that) are never going to given them that power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas.  As usual, I probably didn&#8217;t really get my full point across with my posts on this. A lot of people have taken my characterization of &#8220;stagnant&#8221; as &#8220;dead&#8221; and it&#8217;s not the same at all.  In many ways, I was really hinting at exactly what you say, in terms of &#8220;we are at the beginning&#8221;, only you say it much better than I did.  This is exactly how I feel about it. The &#8220;VoIP industry&#8221; at large became boring and stagnant a while ago, as everybody simply copied Vonage or Skype or tried to come up with yet another way to shave a fraction of a penny off calls &#8211; and that&#8217;s all the press saw and all they talked about.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s far more exiting is the kinds of ways voice/voip can support other applications that Martin describes. We see this specifically in a sub-set of our PhoneGnome users. While the majority still see it as a way to make cheap calls (because that&#8217;s what we all have told them VoIP is about), there is a sub-set that figured out other, far more powerful, benefits in the ways it lets them integrate their web, email, phone(s), voicemails, texts, desktop, laptop and such. That&#8217;s when one gets really hooked and realizes the &#8220;phone companies&#8221; (you can include Vonage and Cable MSOs in that) are never going to given them that power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
