<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IMS in the Wake of Mashups : Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethomashowecompany.com/351/ims-in-the-wake-of-mashups-part-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/351/ims-in-the-wake-of-mashups-part-ii</link>
	<description>Mashing Voice and Process without Mercy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Childs</title>
		<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/351/ims-in-the-wake-of-mashups-part-ii/comment-page-1#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethomashowecompany.com/351/ims-in-the-wake-of-mashups-part-ii#comment-315</guid>
		<description>What do you suggest people use instead of IMS? 

If there are no alternatives there is little pressure on the carriers to change - if their are is it only broad distribution that makes IMS attractive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you suggest people use instead of IMS? </p>
<p>If there are no alternatives there is little pressure on the carriers to change &#8211; if their are is it only broad distribution that makes IMS attractive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

