<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside the Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster</link>
	<description>Mashing Voice and Process without Mercy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster/comment-page-1#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Yeah I can definitely agree with that. There does seem to be a strong bias against RoR and what is &quot;thought&quot; to be the standard platforms to develop telecom web apps on.

I am a firm believer in the agile stratgey, which means you don&#039;t necessarily have to build everything from scratch. Harnessing the power of frameworks already built that enable the development to be quicker to market I think are key.

Talked to a Sales Engineer today in the telecom industry regarding VXML apps and it was interesting to understand his point of view. He was trying to get a handle on how the web can play a much more important role.

Keep the innovation up, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg in regards to web apps that involve integrations with VoIP technologies (whether that physically includes voice or not).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I can definitely agree with that. There does seem to be a strong bias against RoR and what is &#8220;thought&#8221; to be the standard platforms to develop telecom web apps on.</p>
<p>I am a firm believer in the agile stratgey, which means you don&#8217;t necessarily have to build everything from scratch. Harnessing the power of frameworks already built that enable the development to be quicker to market I think are key.</p>
<p>Talked to a Sales Engineer today in the telecom industry regarding VXML apps and it was interesting to understand his point of view. He was trying to get a handle on how the web can play a much more important role.</p>
<p>Keep the innovation up, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg in regards to web apps that involve integrations with VoIP technologies (whether that physically includes voice or not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Howe</title>
		<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster/comment-page-1#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe - 
Yes, I understand where you&#039;re coming from... completely.  And in fact, you&#039;re right about different technologies as well, one of the wonderful things about web as platform development is that you can arbitrarily change  your integration technology.  I mean, as you know, try to take an arbitrary C library and integrate a Java SWING application on top of it.  Not a whole bunch of fun.

I think the reasons why I&#039;m harping on this undeniable-web-technology thing is that I think the vast majority of telecom guys don&#039;t live in that world, and being a bit extreme about my position makes the point about the differences between the technology sets. 

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe &#8211;<br />
Yes, I understand where you&#8217;re coming from&#8230; completely.  And in fact, you&#8217;re right about different technologies as well, one of the wonderful things about web as platform development is that you can arbitrarily change  your integration technology.  I mean, as you know, try to take an arbitrary C library and integrate a Java SWING application on top of it.  Not a whole bunch of fun.</p>
<p>I think the reasons why I&#8217;m harping on this undeniable-web-technology thing is that I think the vast majority of telecom guys don&#8217;t live in that world, and being a bit extreme about my position makes the point about the differences between the technology sets. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster/comment-page-1#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethomashowecompany.com/427/inside-the-disaster#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. However, I have to ask, what is &quot;True-Blue web&quot;?

In reality, alot of developers are fighting to disprove the fact that Ruby on Rails can&#039;t scale and can be just as enterprise as .NET and Java.

Voice Mashups can use a bunch of different tecnologies, all to accomplish the same feats. I think it&#039;s just personal preference.

Jott - .NET
Jaxtr - Java
etc. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. However, I have to ask, what is &#8220;True-Blue web&#8221;?</p>
<p>In reality, alot of developers are fighting to disprove the fact that Ruby on Rails can&#8217;t scale and can be just as enterprise as .NET and Java.</p>
<p>Voice Mashups can use a bunch of different tecnologies, all to accomplish the same feats. I think it&#8217;s just personal preference.</p>
<p>Jott &#8211; .NET<br />
Jaxtr &#8211; Java<br />
etc. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

