Posted on 19 July 2007. Tags: grand central, Jott, ooma, the thomas howe company
How long have you been saying that carrier based telephony is a race to the bottom? Well, you can stop saying it, as we’ve arrived. When you purchase an Ooma phone, you never need to pay for your minutes again. You might shell out four Bennys for the privilege, but that’s it. Yes, that’s it folks – no more paying by the minute ever again. We’ve pressed the bottom button on the ol’ telecom elevator, and the doors have opened. And what I love about this story is how complete the bottoming out is. Andy is always telling me to be as positive as I can in my posts, and when I criticize, to give an example of somebody who’s doing it right. A challenge here, my old friend – but I’ll try.
Technical : C. No, C-. I wonder if anyone told the investors that the Chinese could produce the exact same phone for fifty bucks, or that it simply isn’t that hard to write a peer-to-peer VoIP network. Of course, if Ooma makes any connection to the PSTN (such as DIDs), Ooma has to pay for that somehow, so they have an incremental cost for each customer, no matter how peerish they get. If they don’t, why would you make a bet on yet ANOTHER walled garden? Maybe the phone rocks, but so did PingTel’s. And you know how they turned out. Let’s face it, do you think any phone that attaches to a wall is that compelling? How much better would this be: don’t make a new phone. The old one works fine. Use the same old phone to do something valuable, like
Jott is doing.
Business : D From a business perspective, when do you think the investors will learn that business plans that start out with “Yes, we won’t make any money on the basic service, but we can monetize it later on by doing…” are like something that’s too good to be true? Right – it usually IS too good to be true. Ooma (minus five points for stupid Web 2.0 name) will rely on selling value added services to their subscribers to increase their profits from the phone sale. Value added services? Did anyone check to see the adoption rate for new services with cell phones? The most popular VAS available for phones are ring tones (you want that in your kitchen) and text messaging (does this thing have a keyboard?) How much better would this be: find something so valuable that I’d be willing to pay for it, like
GrandCentral. Give it a smart name, like GrandCentral. Get a real business plan, like GrandCentral.
Buzz : B. Well, compared to Ashton Kutcher’s acting career, this might be a real step up. He typically entertains me for an hour or so at most, but now I can watch Ooma blow through 20 million dollars, it will take months! Maybe even a few years! Nice. Best thing about the company is imagining my retirement with commercials from Ashton encouraging me to make phone calls. I met Demi in 1986 when she came to the restaurant I was working in, and let me tell you, she’s not just pretty – she’s 100 foot pretty. I might buy the damn phone if she signs the box.
Overall : I so wish I could short a private company. Anyone want to bet me?
Posted in Uncategorized
Posted on 03 July 2007. Tags: Jott, mashup, the thomas howe company, voip mashup
Jott is a true diamond in the rough.
The premise is quite simple. Sign on to Jott, upload your contact list, call their number and leave a message. The message is translated and forwarded to the contact, or group, as an e-mail. So, if you’re driving down the highway and you want to leave a quick e-mail for your wife, you pick up your phone and leave the message. I’ve been using it on and off for a bit, and the translations are fairly accurate and certainly usable. Like
Twitter, Jott sits at the intersection between real time communications and social networks. You can create groups that you can Jott too, and I see that Andy Abramson uses Jott as well. It keeps a history of all my Jotts, and could almost serve as a to-list archive. All very cool.
Jott is still in Beta (what does beta mean these days, anyways?), so I suppose I should feel some reluctance to bash them for not having an API. I don’t. They need one, because if they had one, I would be in telephone mashing Valhalla. The current system only works on e-mail, so although it’s great that I can communicate quickly with my friends, family or take notes for myself, the interface to the rest of my workflow is clunky. If I had an API, then it would be a simple matter to Jott myself tasks for my
30boxes calendar. As it is, I’ll have to go through hoops to get that integrated. Any cursory glance into mobile workflow automation shows you how important Jott’s functionality is, and their lack of API hinders that important, and lucrative, market adoption. I’d also ping them for having a “I simply scaffolded this in rails” contact management solution. I have about 500 contacts in Jott, and I’d like to erase them, so I can load up a more current set. I have to page through 20 pages of 25 contacts each to delete them, and unfortunately, I’ve seen speedier web sites. A little more sophistication here would be nice.
There’s a kid in my Karate class who’s so excellent when he concentrates and pays attention. A true natural. When I catch him looking anywhere but in front, I want to smack him – because I hate to see such talent wasted by stupid stuff. The Jott implementation is a bit rough, but a diamond, nonetheless.
- Technically, I’d give them a B. They could be an A, and I think nothing hard is stopping them from getting there. Give me a more mature contact management solution, I’ll give them a B+. Give me a good API, they earned that A.
- From a business standpoint, I give them an A-. The service is valuable, and over time, because of their social networking angle, hard to replicate. I don’t see them charging money yet, but they could.
- From a buzz standpoint, a B+. I’m buzzed about them, and think they have great things in front of them. In the circles I travel, Jott isn’t spoken of with awe and respect, but they should be. It’s a great idea whose time is come.
Posted in Uncategorized